{"id":1776,"date":"2020-11-08T18:03:26","date_gmt":"2020-11-08T23:03:26","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/mediafunhouse.com\/?page_id=1776"},"modified":"2022-06-01T00:48:46","modified_gmt":"2022-06-01T04:48:46","slug":"twenty-eighth-year","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/mediafunhouse.com\/?page_id=1776","title":{"rendered":"Twenty-eighth year"},"content":{"rendered":"

1405.) We\u2019ll be playing catch-up forever with the period of the late Sixties and early Seventies, when the film world exploded with unique, amorphous creations that mirrored the weird alternate directions society was going in during that time. And a lot of these films were aimed solely at [gasp!] adult viewers. Case in point: Belladonna of Sadness<\/em> (1973), a cult Japanese animated feature that blends a French folk tale about sorcery in with fine art, psychedelia, rock opera, a heartsick romance, battle scenes, and Satanism. Plus, sex \u2013 and not the giddy, tee-hee dirty-joke kind of sex aimed at American teens, but intense, crazed (and Satanic) adult sex \u2013 in a cartoon even. The film\u2019s look draws on everything from erotic etchings (and also standard anime) to Klimt, Beardsley, and yes, Yellow Submarine<\/em>. As is often said about movies from the era \u201cthat keeps on giving, and giving, and…\u201d they wouldn\u2019t make this sort of thing today.<\/p>\n

1406.) In our ongoing discussion of movies that are underseen, under-appreciated, or just plain unknown, this week I discuss and show excerpts from Peter Lorre\u2019s only film as a writer-director, The Lost One<\/em> (1951). The film, produced in Germany, makes one wish Lorre had directed more, since he wisely borrowed from (and riffed off of) effects from the work of directors he acted for \u2013 from Fritz Lang and Hitchcock to von Sternberg and a host of great noir filmmakers. The plot follows a doctor working with displaced persons after WWII who is forced to remember his activity during the war \u2013 which included him killing his fiancee and then trying to kill other women. It\u2019s an overly scripted film with an unnecessary second plot strand, but when it concerns Lorre\u2019s haunted memories, it\u2019s great.<\/p>\n

1407.) Vintage: As a \u201clater chapter\u201d to my discussions on the show about May \u201968 and its effect on European cinema \u2013 namely, in the \u201cwhat next?\u201d category \u2013 this week I present a discussion of, and clips from, Swiss filmmaker Alain Tanner\u2019s \u201cgreatest hit,\u201d the delightfully charming and surprisingly humorous Jonah Who Will Be 25 in the Year 2000<\/em> (1976). The film openly refers to the impact that May \u201968 had on politically active young people, with Tanner and his co-scripter, novelist John Berger, trying to offer answers to the aforementioned question. What\u2019s next for the characters in the film \u2013 played by a great ensemble, including Mioux-Mioux and Dominique Labourier (Celine and Julie\u2026<\/em>) \u2013 are various methods of opting out of the system or undermining it. One couple run a farm, another gent becomes a teacher (intent on opening the minds of the younger generation), another woman covertly robs her employer (an overpriced gourmet supermarket), and one former radical (in between proofing jobs \u2013 yikes!) warns community farmers when bankers and realtors are plotting to buy their farms and sell them for more. Tanner made a number of great films, but the reason that Jonah<\/em> has perhaps been viewed as his crowning achievement is that the characters are indeed so likeable and the plot is both politically relevant and engrossing.<\/p>\n

1408.) The fifth and final episode in my series of episodes devoted to the work of cult Czech filmmaker Vera Chytilova. In this show, I discuss and show scenes from Pleasant Moments<\/em> (2006), her last fiction film. It follows straight on from Traps<\/em>, featured in the last show, as it is a social satire that begins in a more broadly comic vein and then becomes a psychodrama as chaos takes over the life of the protagonist, a psychologist whose patients (and family, and her patients\u2019 families) are driving her nuts. By this point in her career Chytilova was fine with expanding her storylines from the main character outward (thus many subthreads in the film I don\u2019t discuss on the show), but the focus here is on the psychologist who is supposed to help her clients set their lives straight while hers has turned upside down.<\/p>\n

1409.) Xmastime has long been the season of TV spectaculars and \u201cspecial Christmas episodes\u201d of regular series. Here in the Funhouse, the less Xmas the better, so I present for the holiday a little hand-chosen mini-retro of scenes from \u201cThe Dean Martin Show.\u201d (Not the Xmas special with Dean and Frank, which we showed years ago; nor are these clips repeated from preceding \u201cbest of Dean\u201d shows.) Here I focus specifically on items I enjoy \u2013 the musical interludes on the show and the comedy bits that are above and beyond the usual variety-show scripting (which was lame, oh boy, was it lame\u2026). In the case of Dean\u2019s show, that was whenever Jonathan Winters showed up and essayed a number of characters, coming up with bizarre lines and wonderfully funny fake anecdotes (which honestly did surprise Dean and make him laugh) and the odd but welcome inclusion on Dean\u2019s show of sketches from British comedians, most specifically Marty Feldman (assisted in this show in one soccer sketch by two young Pythons).<\/p>\n

1410.) For the New Year week, I present a second hand-picked collection of clips from \u201cThe Dean Martin Show\u201d with another intro discussing the show\u2019s ups and downs. In this assortment I emphasize his collaborations with musical guests and the good comedy that aired on the show, in the persons of the master ad-libber Jonathan Winters and the master sketch-writer and performer Marty Feldman. And since this kind of thing will never appear again on U.S. TV, a bit of the sexist Dino (without the \u201cwomen as pets\u201d sketches he used to do). It\u2019s a lovely selection, and (hoping, hoping\u2026) this next year has gotta be better than this one!<\/p>\n

1411.) Back to the \u201ctoo good for BBC-America\u201d department for more of one of the finest monologists working today, the U.K.’s Daniel Kitson. Discussion and clips explore Kitson\u2019s recent work.<\/p>\n

1412.) It\u2019s never too late to salute any artist we love in the Funhouse. So, many months after the centennial of his birth, I present a multi-part tribute to the late, great Federico Fellini. In the first part of this series, I discuss and show scenes from his initial b&w work, stretching from his first, co-directed, film, Variety Lights<\/em> (1950), through the second turning point in his filmography, La Dolce Vita<\/em> (1960). In this decade\u2019s-worth of films Fellini forged an identity as a filmmaker who used the lessons of Neo-realism (he wrote for and assisted Rossellini) while also creating a dreamy style that was to flourish in his biggest international hit during this period, La Strada<\/em> (1954), and later became the full-blown mix of elements that was dubbed \u201cFellini-esque.\u201d He also began transforming the elements of his youth into a personal mythology (with I Vitelloni<\/em>) and providing career-making roles for various Italian actors, including his wife until his death, Giulietta Masina (La Strada<\/em>, Nights of Cabiria<\/em>).<\/p>\n

1413.) Returning to the work of Funhouse favorite Aki Kaurismaki, I discuss, and show scenes from his first two features, Crime and Punishment<\/em> (1983) and Calamari Union<\/em> (1985). The first film is indeed an adaptation of Dostoevsky, but the film has a closer connection to Bresson\u2019s own variation on the theme, Pickpocket<\/em>. Kaurismaki\u2019s version is deadpan, but in a more existential sense; Calamari Union<\/em> is where his trademark deadpan humor entered his films. It\u2019s a mostly indescribable film, shot in stark, beautiful b&w, about a group of men (all named Frank) who journey across Helsinki seeking paradise. What they wind up getting is either being suckered into various situations or killed. So it goes. There is smoking, drinking, and rock \u2019n\u2019 roll on the way, so not all is ridiculous tragedy.<\/p>\n

1414.) Sometimes \u201clost\u201d films are not so interesting when they are found. That is not the case with the long-out-of-circulation (and now available only in obscure corners of the Net) 1973 telefilm Sticks and Bones<\/em>. A stirring and grim adaptation of a stirring and grim play, the film adapts David Rabe\u2019s first produced work about the effect of Vietnam on \u201cthe average American family.\u201d In this case, the elder son comes back from Vietnam blind and full of tales of both his love for a Vietnamese woman and the violence that he saw. The piece was shot on video with a wide-angle lens to create a paranoid atmosphere and was directed, quite well, by a filmmaker known for his independent comedies, Robert Downey (Sr). The cast includes two \u201cname\u201d performers (at least to us watching in the present day), Cliff DeYoung as the blind veteran and Anne Jackson as his doting mother, and is most important because it was commissioned by, and aired on, CBS TV during the summer of 1973. Many affiliates refused to carry it and watching it now, one is struck by how raw it is and how stunning it is that it was *ever* a project for a mainstream American TV network.<\/p>\n

1415.) Returning to the world of Canadian TV auteur Ken Finkleman (best known for \u201cThe Newsroom\u201d \u2013 the great, dark-humored one that came before the American series of the same title), this week I present a discussion of, and scenes from, the 2006 miniseries \u201cAt the Hotel.\u201d It\u2019s an odd creation but one that dazzles in its first few episodes. We follow the various narratives in a hotel that caters to artists of all stripes, from washed-up performers reliving former glories, to younger performers just starting out, to the mystery surrounding a murder that occurred in the early Sixties. The film (as it\u2019s really a sort of elongated telefilm) thus changes tone every few minutes, with Dennis Potter-esque sudden musical numbers being the most delightful element. Finkleman was involved in some middling American movie comedies in the Eighties, but his work on Canadian TV echoes Potter (the acme of TV writing) in terms of quality, and yet also prefigures Larry David in its nasty dialogue and dark occurrences. Hopefully his work will gain some sort of reputation down in the \u201clower 48,\u201d as it\u2019s the kind of stuff that encourages repeated viewings.<\/p>\n

1416.) In the \u201cseparating the art from the artist\u201d department, this week I return to the topic of Roman Polanski. I discuss his recent work and note the continued brilliance of his filmmaking, which is currently banned from these shores (as of two movies ago, even DVD\/Blu-ray releases aren\u2019t happening).<\/p>\n

1417.) You say, \u201cEd, can you find me a 1970s b&w feature-length student film (by a now-noted director) that is both creepy and funny, features musical numbers, and muses on the mortality of Laurel and Hardy? Can it star two of the featured acts from Forbidden Zone<\/em>, plus two Scorsese character actors, and the late, great Ray Sharkey?\u201d (Not a good person, but a great actor.) Well, you\u2019re in luck this week, as I\u2019m discussing, and showing scenes from, Hot Tomorrows<\/em> (1977), Martin Brest\u2019s wonderfully grim student feature about two Bronx guys on a journey to the end of the night in L.A. Ken Lerner stars as a screenwriter whose old NYC buddy (Sharkey) visits him in L.A. where the two go to a bar and encounter an amiable gent (Victor Argo) saddled with an angry, drunk, philosophical little person (the inimitable Herve Villechaize!). The bar\u2019s entertainment is a cross between a Weimar cabaret act and an American swing band (The Mystic Knights of the Oingo Boingo). The next stop on the Bronx boys\u2019 itinerary is a mortuary (a famous voice summons them there \u2013 not sure how he got in there) and their final stop is an old-age home where magical things happen upstairs. The film is the best thing Brest ever made, and is a delightful evocation of optimistic Thirties movies funneled through a cynical Seventies lens.<\/p>\n

1418.) A Deceased Artiste tribute to the prolific, diverse, and incredibly talented screenwriter Jean-Claude Carriere, conceived of as a simple tribute to one of his movies (with a verbal paean to his talent, since he was clearly the \u201cauteur\u201d of the film in question), shot just a few weeks ago before he died on Feb. 8 of this year. The film in question will be the subject of not one but two Funhouse eps, as it\u2019s a fascinating and successful experiment in changing tones and blended genres. The Wedding Ring<\/em> (1970) starts out as the tale of two lonely, nebbish-y characters who meet via a matchmaking service. Once wed, we discover their individual peculiarities, which leads both husband and wife to believe their spouse is trying to kill them. Underneath all this, however, is another plot strand, which is mentioned in the dialogue quite often (and results in a terrific surprise conclusion), but which one doesn\u2019t pay as much attention to, given the \u201cthriller\u201d and absurdist level of the proceedings. Carriere plays the introverted and quite strange husband and the lovely Anna Karina stars as his mysterious wife. The film is such an interesting experiment in tone and genre that it justifies being the subject of two episodes.<\/p>\n

1419.) The second and last episode devoted to the underseen and cult-worthy The Wedding Ring<\/em> (1970), intended as a Deceased Artiste tribute to the late, great screenwriter Jean-Claude Carriere. Here Carriere had one of his rare starring roles (and scripted, based on his novel) as a mysterious veterinarian who consults a matchmaker to get a wife (preferably, one with a very big apartment to handle his studies of animals and insects). Anna Karina costars as his equally mysterious partner, a woman who suspects she might end up the victim of Carriere or one of his animal charges; he, in turn, believes that she is trying to kill him. And all the while, another subplot is developing, which provides the film\u2019s extremely trippy ending. The Funhouse is glad once again to present the U.S.TV premiere of scenes from an obscure gem from the mind of the very prolific and very talented Carriere.<\/p>\n

1420.) Proving that Halloween lasts all year long in the Funhouse, this week the focus is on the first TV horror host, the \u201cglamour ghoul,\u201d the goth icon, Vampira (aka Maila Nurmi). There are three separate docs about her out there, each of which provides a different piece of the puzzle of her life (and there, most assuredly, is room for a fourth that would go into the sadder moments between oblivion and rediscovery). I discuss her career and then provide a \u201cmega-mix\u201d of sorts, in which I combine scenes from all three of the docs. The first is a Finnish production (Nurmi was a Finn by heritage) called Vampira: About Sex, Death & Taxes<\/em> (1995), which presents Nurmi on camera and on location in various parts of L.A. telling her tales of inspiration, fame, and then almost instant has-been status \u2013 the most startling part of her story is that the Vampira TV show (which was always local, seen only in L.A.) got national and international press within a scant few weeks of its debut and was off the air within a year later, because the station was looking to syndicate the character without Nurmi\u2019s approval. (She held ownership of \u201cVampira\u201d and tried to hang on to it, even when they later revamped the character and turned her into Elvira.) The second of the docs is Vampira: the Movie<\/em> (2006), which is more specifically about her horror hosting and her impact on future generations of goth kids and horror hosts alike. (She predated the late \u201957 emergence of the \u201cShock Theater\u201d package and the second TV horror host, Roland\/Zacherley.) The third doc, Vampira and Me<\/em> (2012), offers a more personal, sympathetic look at Nurmi\u2019s life, and the discovery of two additional TV appearances she made in character \u2013 since a scant few minutes exists of her less than a year-and-a-half reign (she had a second brief run on another channel) on the air in L.A.<\/p>\n

1421.) Closing out my series of episodes on the films of Aki Kaurismaki that never received distribution in the U.S., this week I spotlight Hamlet Goes Business<\/em> (1987), his deadpan take on Shakespeare that is close to the original in terms of character names and action, but is truly an Aki movie in that the characters drink, smoke (a lot!), and listen to rock \u2019n\u2019 roll on a very conspicuous jukebox. In the process there are lovely melodramatic sequences and some memorably absurdist twists on a very familiar tale.<\/p>\n

1422.) I\u2019m always happy to pay tribute to departed heroes and heroines in the Funhouse, and this week, months after his death, I\u2019m extremely happy to salute the career of character actor Allen Garfield. His final years were spent in bad health, but from the late Sixties through the Nineties he worked non-stop in theater, movies, and television. During the much-revered (and rightly so) \u201cmaverick\u201d period of American cinema in the early Seventies he worked for (a short list) De Palma, Downey Sr, Ritchie, Coppola, and Altman. As he got older, he changed both physically and moniker-wise \u2013 he lost much weight and for a time went back to his birth name of Allen Goorwitz (but then resumed his career as A. Garfield when he found the parts were more limited with an \u201cethnic\u201d name). In the early Eighties, he gave one of his finest-ever scene-stealing supporting roles \u2013 as the Coppola-like renegade producer living in a mobile home traveling through the late-night streets of L.A. in Wim Wenders\u2019 The State of Things<\/em> (1982). He continued to act until his health prevented him from doing so. Reviewing the work of scene-stealing character actors like Garfield is one special joy of doing the Funhouse.<\/p>\n

1423.) Vintage: This week it\u2019s another U.S. TV premiere of material that hasn\u2019t played in any NYC rep house or museum in the decades I\u2019ve been following this stuff. The films in question are two shorts made by master-director Douglas Sirk with his students at a Munich film school. Sirk was the hero of Rainer Werner Fassbinder, who urged him to take on the teaching post \u2013 and also \u201clent\u201d several of his talented actors and crew members to Sirk\u2019s shorts (he himself appeared in the very last Sirk short \u201cBourbon Street Blues,\u201d which I showed on the show a few years ago). The first short, \u201cTalk to Me Like the Rain\u201d (1976) is an adaptation of a wonderfully bleak 1953 Tennessee Williams one-act that incorporates the hallmarks of Sirk\u2019s visual style and allowed him to \u201cre-enter\u201d the cinema on a modest basis. The second film, \u201cNew Year\u2019s Eve \u2013 a Dialogue\u201d (1978) is an adaptation of a wistful 1901 Arthur Schnitzler one-act that stars none other than Fassbinder\u2019s main superstar, Hanna Schygulla. Sirk\u2019s shorts have remained unseen in this country theatrically, and while they may not be on the level of his earlier feature work, they are still fascinating \u201creflections\u201d of what he was capable of imparting to a younger generation of filmmakers.<\/p>\n

1424.) Vintage: Easter has always been a time of blasphemy in the Funhouse, but this year I wanted to do something different and special. And so, a two-part Easter episode (two segments in one show \u2013 28 minutes of Paschal joy!). In the first part I discuss the passing of the sublime writer Jimmy Breslin and read from his very pertinent book from 2004, The Church That Forgot Christ. The book is an extended essay on Jimmy\u2019s deep belief in the Catholic religion, and his extreme anger at the plague of pedophilia that has been part and parcel of the Church for so long (and in so many different cities and countries). Breslin\u2019s writing was powerful and direct, so I\u2019m glad to have him \u201cspeaking\u201d (with his usual mixture of beautiful sentiment and streetwise humor) in our Easter celebration about the corruption at the root of the Church. On a lighter note, the second half of the show finds us back in Rapture territory, with the \u201creboot\u201d of the Left Behind<\/em> franchise, an incredibly ridiculous thriller from 2014 starring Nicolas Cage (who clearly needs cash, and fast) as an airplane pilot who comes to terms with the missing folks on his airliner. It\u2019s patently awful, but when sliced down to a few minutes, it\u2019s quite enjoyable. And Nic the over-actor isn\u2019t alone \u2013 he\u2019s joined by an angry little man who instantly became my favorite character in this wretched little suspenser\u2026.<\/p>\n

1425.) Vintage: One of the best things about three of the British comedians I\u2019ve spotlighted on the show \u2013 namely Richard Herring, Stewart Lee, and Robin Ince \u2013 is that they are constantly curating and\/or hosting shows and podcasts that feature other terrific standup comics we most probably will never see on \u201cthis side of the pond.\u201d This week I offer clips from Lee\u2019s major effort in that direction, a Comedy Central (UK) show called “The Alternative Comedy Experience.” Lee doesn\u2019t m.c. the proceedings, but his interviews with the participants punctuate segments from their acts. The comics have different approaches and are major \u201cdiscoveries\u201d for American fans of British humor. They are most similar in the fact that nearly all deconstruct their acts as they construct them (using tangents, audience work, and other techniques to acknowledge the standup \u201cpose\u201d). The show also showcases several great women standups who approach their comedy from a very different direction than their American counterparts (read: no detailed discussion of sex). The comics hail from England, Scotland, Ireland, and Canada, so the array of accents on display is fascinating as well.<\/p>\n

1426.) We return once more to the Sixties, the \u201cera that keeps on giving and giving and…\u201d with an episode about Brazilian Cinema Novo icon Glauber Rocha and his trend-setting political film Terra em Transe<\/em> (World in a Trance, 1967). The film is a gorgeous black-and-white drama about a poet who can\u2019t decide which of his two \u201cgodfather\u201d benefactors he wants to support \u2013 a Right-wing megalomaniac or a supposedly Left \u201cman of the people\u201d who wants to free them from tyranny. Terra<\/em> is a timeless political parable, since the Rightist politician is openly contemptuous of the common person in his district \u2013 a land called here \u201cEldorado\u201d \u2013 and the supposedly \u201cLeft\u201d pol (who would in the U.S. be a Democratic \u201clesser of two evils\u201d centrist-liberal) does nothing to stem the tide of the poor being exploited and killed. Rocha\u2019s visual style is balletic and extraordinary; his storytelling style is heavy derived from both Godard and the \u201cItalian New Wave\u201d directors; and he includes one concession to mass taste \u2013 which is that the poet is a conventionally rugged blond dude who is a ladykiller that, throughout his existential journey, is James Bond-like in his bedding down women of the Left, women of the Right, and women he runs into at the trippy orgiastic parties held by a local media mogul. Rocha is one of the very important building blocks of Sixties world cinema and I\u2019m glad to present scenes from his work on the Funhouse.<\/p>\n

1427.) Returning for the second part of my tribute to the icon Fellini, this time it\u2019s strictly his work in the Sixties, the decade when \u201cFellini-esque\u201d became a much-used adjective, as he developed his signature style of mixing dreams and memory with present-day reality, and countless filmmakers decided to copy his style (mostly to lesser effect). He only made four features and three shorts in the Sixties, but each one of them further refined his focus on the imagination and what he called his main theme: \u201cstraining to hear \u2026 something that\u2019s been nearly forgotten.\u201d From La Dolce Vita<\/em> to Satyricon<\/em>, he went beyond the fame he had achieved in the Fifties to become a cinematic institution \u2013 while also giving his two favorite performers, Marcello Mastroianni and his wife Guilietta Masina, their best-ever roles.<\/p>\n

1428.) Something a little different this week: two short films discussed and then shown in their near-entirety. (The opening credits had to be sacrificed for time purposes.) The first is Funhouse deity Aki Kaurismaki\u2019s short contribution to the anthology feature Centro Historico<\/em> (2012), a Portuguese film that salutes the country from different angles. Aki\u2019s short concerns the struggling owner of a very small restaurant who is challenged by the large nightspot down the street. The piece is dialogue-less and is of a whole with Kaurismaki\u2019s features but has \u201cdisappeared,\u201d since it was part of a project that was barely seen in the U.S. The second short is \u201cThe Nail Clippers\u201d (1969) by Jean-Claude Carriere (with Milos Forman listed as co-scripter). This film continues the fascination that the immaculately talented scripter (who worked with an insanely broad assortment of great filmmakers from different countries) had for small \u201cgag\u201d situations with oddly existential overtones. In this case, the recently departed Michael Lonsdale (another Funhouse favorite) finds that he\u2019s lost his nail clippers while in a hotel with his wife. The situation gets stranger from there. I\u2019m very happy to take these \u201cdeep dives\u201d into the filmographies of our favorite artists on the Funhouse, as shorter works are often overlooked when talking about a filmmaker\u2019s career.<\/p>\n

1429.) Returning to the deep well of French films not shown in the U.S., this week I discuss and show scenes from \u201cLes Espions\u201d (the Spies, 1957) by Henri-Georges Clouzot. A rather unusual film, it is a tale of intrigue that also has an absurdist sense of humor which unfortunately disappears as the proceedings gradually turn into a real spy drama. The plot is one of uncertain identity \u2013 a French psychiatrist is recruited by an American spy to house a mysterious figure in his clinic. As soon as that premise is set up, the memorable supporting characters begin showing up \u2013 two of whom are played by the great Sam Jaffe (speaking French and reflecting in the dialogue about being suspected of having Communist sympathies; he was indeed blacklisted in the Fifties) and Funhouse deity Peter Ustinov (offering a letter-perfect portrait of a shifty Lithuanian whose French is impeccable, as are his wonderful mannerisms). The film does have a weird shift in tone that doesn\u2019t quite work, but it also has some great sequences and a top-notch cast (including the director\u2019s wife, the fascinating-to-watch Vera Clouzot. playing a mental patient).<\/p>\n

1430.) The third part of my four-part tribute to the brilliant and much-ripped-off Federico Fellini showcases his work from the 1970s. In that decade he continued his journeys into memory and fantasy as well as bitter reality, but he added other pigments to his palette with a political allegory (Orchestra Rehearsal<\/em>), telefilms, a period piece with a lot of sex (Fellini\u2019s Casanova<\/em>) and a message about male ego, and a response to the flak he had received from feminists (City of Women<\/em>). Oh, and an unmitigated masterpiece (Amarcord<\/em>), distributed in the U.S. by none other than Roger Corman! Even when he was \u201cout of fashion\u201d critically (like the other Masters of cinema, Fellini went in and out of fashion several times in his career), his work was top-notch.<\/p>\n

1431.) Revamped, updated vintage episode: To commemorate the recent passing of Bertrand Tavernier, I present my 2005 interview with him. This episode was all that aired of a much longer talk, due to immensely irritating tech troubles (quick version: mini-DV tapes lose their audio VERY quickly). The original description: My lively interview with celebrated French filmmaker Bertrand Tavernier explores his latest film \u2014 which never subsequently got a U.S. distributor \u2013 Holy Lola<\/em>, a tale of a French couple looking to adopt in Cambodia. Tavernier is best known for his well-received period pieces (A Sunday in the Country<\/em>) and his very straightforwardly scripted cross-cultural pieces (Round Midnight<\/em>), but in recent years he\u2019s made a series of socially conscious pictures that fit into the great \u201chumanist\u201d tradition of French cinema, as well as demonstrate his versatility as a filmmaker. In this initial part of our chat, we tie Lola<\/em> in to his last two films: Safe Conduct<\/em>, a personalized chronicle of filmmaking in France during the German occupation that\u2019s half character study\/half thriller, and the vastly underrated It All Starts Today<\/em>, a low-key drama (reminiscent of Loach and Leigh) about a kindergarten teacher in a small French town trying to \u201cmake a difference\u201d in the lives of his students (the film, as Tavernier declared in one of the moments I had to exclude from the show, is \u201cnot Dead Poet\u2019s Society<\/em>!\u201d).<\/p>\n

1432.) In the interim between his over-the-top CGI extravaganza Twisted Pair<\/em> (his fifth film) and whatever will be his sixth venture into clueless \u2013 or highly calculated? \u2013 moviemaking, the always consistent Neil Breen decided that he needed to share his secrets as an auteur. The result is a five-hour documentary of him sitting and telling you said \u201csecrets\u201d that he decided should be a $150 purchase for his fans. (These secrets don\u2019t come cheap, fellas and gals.) The rather odd things about the doc? He called it a \u201cretrospective\u201d (sort of redefining that word, since this is not a film festival or a box set); he picked a number of topics and then shows us scenes from his films that don\u2019t quite fit those topics; and, best of all, in the segment being discussed and excerpted in this episode, he calls green screen-created spaces \u201clocations\u201d and also makes the claim that wild animals seen in his films via green screen are 100% real. This last odd detail (which he does quite often in the second half of the doc) indicates that Breen is perhaps as clueless as he has seemed to be, or he\u2019s an inveterate liar, or his career as the \u201cmost filmmaker who gets more clueless with each film he makes\u201d is a ruse and he is actually a very canny performance artist. It\u2019s hard to choose between those three, but in the process you\u2019ll see a man claiming that a dimestore rubber fright mask is a \u201cspecial effect\u201d that lent one film \u201cproduction value.\u201d You won\u2019t hear that in film class, will you?<\/p>\n

1433.) Offering the usual Funhouse array of \u201cstuff you ain\u2019t seeing anyplace else,\u201d this week I offer a discussion of, and scenes from, Werner Schroeter\u2019s telefilm The Bomber Pilot<\/em> (1970). Telling the tale (sorta) of a trio of young women who entertained the Nazis and try to assimilate into the regular German populace after the war, Schroeter uses the stark (but beautifully colored) style of underground filmmakers to offer a procession of vignettes that either show the women doing their acts to audiences (and trying not to brag about their National Socialist fame) or haunting location shots that show them out of synch with the populace (which is clearly the German citizenry \u2013 and a few American soldiers \u2013 of 1969-70). Schroeter\u2019s work is rarely shown in the U.S. and its visual beauty, as well as its fine-tuned sense of both classic kitsch and operatic drama, makes it well worth seeking out.<\/p>\n

1434.) Part one of a tribute to Deceased Artiste George Segal focuses on the first five years that he starred in films, from 1965 to 1970. Segal\u2019s appeal lay in his mixture of everyday hero and a kind of low-key urban neurosis (Woody Allen he was not \u2013 nor was he Elliott Gould). In the period I\u2019m covering in this show, he had achieved fame in Ship of Fools<\/em> and Virginia Woolf<\/em> (neither of which are excerpted here) and began his starring career. This extends from the prisoner-of-war drama King Rat<\/em>, which placed him among a top-notch group of British actors, to The Owl and the Pussycat<\/em>, where he is fully in the Sixties \u201curban loser\u201d mode. Not forgetting a Funhouse favorite, Sidney Lumet\u2019s Bye Bye Braverman<\/em> (1968), a perfect middle-age angst comedy. Segal\u2019s other life, as a musician and singer of old-time, ragtime music, is covered via a discussion of his recordings and scenes from his most famous talk-show appearance (and it wasn\u2019t for Johnny Carson, with whom he appeared many times).<\/p>\n

1435.) The valiant search for the most clueless filmmaker \u2013 scratch that: the *most entertaining* clueless filmmaker \u2013 can lead down dark alleys to dead ends. However, one viewing of The Astrologer<\/em> (1976) reminds us that the best kind of auteur-adrift is the kind who writes\/directs\/produces\/edits\/scores and of course stars in their own work. Over the years the Funhouse has celebrated Renee Harmon (back in the mid-Nineties), the cult-possessing \u201cincredibly strange\u201d and psychotronic filmmakers, and the modern flowering of cluelessness (Wiseau, the guy who made Birdemic<\/em>, the guy who made Dangerous Men<\/em>, and all-around champ, Neil Breen). The Astrologer<\/em> is one of those works \u2013 an amazingly egomaniacal journey taken by real-life astrologer Craig Denney, who made $ off of computer-created charts for his customers and then set out to create his own Citizen Kane<\/em>. Thus a film that has many, many plot threads and some severely incompetent acting \u2013 the former is most likely because Denney initially wanted to make a action TV series about a kick-ass astrologer, with each episode set in a different country. (The latter because the cast is made up of his friends and relatives.) The scripting thus consists of a series of v.o. narration bits that try to stitch the many plots together (with an overall frame device about the \u201crise and fall\u201d of an egomaniacal astrologer). The piece de resistance is that the film can\u2019t come out on DVD \/Blu-ray (and never was released on VHS) because Denney just liberally helped himself to classic rock and one-hit wonder pop tunes for his soundtrack, and didn\u2019t license them. It\u2019s hard to be that crazy, but the clueless auteur can work low-trash miracles. PLUS: Your humble servant pines for the days when Manhattan had cult-movie cinemas doing late-night atrocity screenings.<\/p>\n

1436.) Vintage: Back in the \u201cToo Good for BBC-America\u201d department of the show, I now face an interesting situation: giving the U.S. TV \u201cpremiere\u201d to a show that was too good for the BBC in England. Limmy\u2019s Show!<\/em> (2010-2013) was the brainchild of Scottish comedian\/Net wizard Brian Limond (aka \u201cLimmy\u201d) and it only aired on BBC-Scotland (the show still got great reviews in England and inspired fans like Charlie Brooker and Richard Herring). The show featured an array of different sorts of humor, from character comedy (replete with taglines and repeated phrasing), to brilliant (often dark) observational rants from Limmy, to truly grim sketches that prove that life is funniest when *not* viewed through rose-colored glasses. Limmy\u2019s Glaswegian burr is indeed thick, but his comedy is universal \u2013 from smart, silent sight gags to reflections on aging (unusual for a rather young comedian \u2013 Limmy was 36-39 when the show was airing).<\/p>\n

1437.) Vintage: This week I close off my exploration of the first season of Stewart Lee\u2019s series that aired on Comedy Central UK, “The Alternative Comedy Experience.” This time out I pick up where I left off on the preceding show, with U.K. stand-ups offering different types of cutting-edge, often wonderfully weird, comedy. We start off with those whose humor is similar to the British comics I\u2019ve featured on the show in the last few years, but then move on to the world of concept comedians who do odd acts involving easels, hand-painted postcards, and a very strange ant costume. It\u2019s richly strange stuff that\u2019s also very funny and I\u2019m very glad to give these folks their \u201cU.S. TV premieres\u201d on the Funhouse.<\/p>\n

1438.) In the first of a series of shows dedicated to the currently \u201cforgotten\u201d French auteur Bertrand Blier (still with us at 82), I anticipate episodes about his rarest films with a survey of the films of his that are currently in print on DVD and Blu-ray. Blier\u2019s Seventies and Eighties work was both masterfully absurd and imaginatively vulgar \u2013 by today\u2019s standards he was not only un-p.c. but un-\u201cwoke.\u201d However, if you dig into his work of the Seventies and early Eighties (he changed direction successfully in the Nineties), you find a brilliant satirical mind that played with gender expectations and stereotypes by depicting moronic male characters and numb females. He broke through with the first film I discuss, Going Places<\/em> (1974), a \u201cshock\u201d to the French film industry that depicted two traveling hoodlums and their odyssey in the provinces of France \u2013 moronic they are, but they are also oddly charming, thanks to the performances of the then-unknown Gerard Depardieu, Miou-Miou, and the brilliant and lost-too-soon Patrick Dewaere. Blier reteamed those two male stars (who functioned well as a comedy team) in the Best Foreign Film Oscar winner Get Out Your Handkerchiefs<\/em> (1978), a sexy and quite off-kilter study of male-female relations. The last film in the survey is Buffet Froid<\/em> (1979), one of Blier\u2019s two oddest films, a dark comedy that is indebted to the Theater of the Absurd and wonderfully depicts the lonely world of nighttime suburban France.<\/p>\n

1439.) For sheer entertainment value and unpredictability, nothing beats the variety shows of the Sixties and early Seventies, where the \u201cold\u201d met the \u201cnew\u201d on a regular basis, and the result was often bizarre but always watchable. This week I start a series of episodes about Ann-Margret\u2019s TV specials that followed that formula \u2013 but with some added twists that belonged specifically to A-M (and the men who crafted her image). Her first special from 1968, \u201cThe Ann-Margret Show,\u201d has a blissfully schizo construction that showcased both Ann-Margrets \u2013 the twentysomething young woman who wanted to be part of \u201cold show-biz,\u201d performing standards and doing vaudeville turns with senior-citizen comedians, and the girl of the rock generation who would go-go dance up a storm and incarnated the perfect \u201csex kitten\u201d image (stolen for various other stars of the Sixties, including Nancy Sinatra and Raquel Welch, and singers thereafter). The 1968 special makes odd genre-jumps that are even odder than the \u201cold\u201d meeting the \u201cnew\u201d \u2013 as when A-M sings a then-current pop rock song with Bob Hope and then sails directly into a Swedish lullaby her mother used to sing to her (with filmed visuals that indicate that director David Winters had seen Elvira Madigan<\/em>). Also included in this ep: A-M on a motorcycle both in an outdoor filmed sequence and onstage. And, yes, portraying a go-go girl in a cage (a bit from her Vegas act of that time).<\/p>\n

1440.) Part 2 of my tribute to French master-absurdist Bertrand Blier highlights his lost-in-the-U.S. film Calmos<\/em> (1976, aka \u201cFemmes Fatales\u201d). A thoroughly bizarre view of a literal \u201cwar between the sexes,\u201d the film chronicles the efforts of a gynecologist and a pimp to escape the constant sexual demands of women. They flee to the countryside, wind up in an actual war with the forces of femininity, and end up having to \u201cserve\u201d womankind (and it gets even weirder from there). The film can be viewed simply as a sexist fantasy but, as elsewhere in Blier\u2019s films, the two lead characters here are depicted as morons and chronic complainers, and thus, the film itself is a takedown of both genders with the emphasis being on the ridiculous lengths married men will go to in order to escape the Missus.<\/p>\n

1441.) Vintage episode newly re-digitized and updated: [Original description] At some point in the future folks are going to look back at the films and videos of Chris Marker, and realize that this \u201canonymous\u201d essayist was perhaps one of the greatest artists (and greatest minds) of the latter half of the 20th century. This week I\u2019m proud to comment on two of his little-seen works \u2014 in fact, pretty much all of his filmography is little-seen outside of the two works that have constantly been in circulation (“La Jet\u00e9e,” Sans Soleil<\/em>). Marker\u2019s favorite topics were memory, the image, the media and, of course, cats. He also has made some of the most brilliant political features and shorts; among them is \u201cThe Sixth Side of the Pentagon,\u201d his account of the 1967 March on the Pentagon. Marker was in the thick of things with his portable camera, and caught the event from \u201cinside.\u201d Nearly four decades later he made another feature about youth participating in what the French call \u201cdemos,\u201d The Case of the Grinning Cat<\/em> (2004). The latter is a richly textured essay about political dissent in the 21st century, the power of graffiti (or as Mailer called it, \u201cthe faith of graffiti\u201d) and, again, cats. Marker\u2019s works grow richer with each reviewing, and are vastly underrated and under-shown.<\/p>\n

1442.) The public at large and the press forget about dead celebs a few days after their demise, but in the Funhouse we never stop loving them. Thus, Part 2 of my George Segal Deceased Artiste tribute appears a few months after Segal\u2019s death and celebrates the second part of his \u201cgolden period,\u201d covering the years 1970 to 1974. George was getting starring roles throughout that time and working on great projects, often helmed by some of the best of the wonderful early Seventies \u201cmaverick\u201d directors. So I move here from Where’s Poppa?<\/em> (1970), where Carl Reiner delved into \u201csick humor\u201d (and \u201cblack humor,\u201d now referred to as dark humor) for the first and only time in his career, through other entertaining films to reach Segal\u2019s sole starring turns for a pair of Funhouse favorites. The first is Paul Mazursky, in Blume in Love<\/em> (1973), a tale of a divorced man trying to win back his ex-wife. (Yes, by today\u2019s standards it\u2019s a \u201cstalking\u201d tale, but at base level it\u2019s a tale of romantic obsession, with Mazursky harkening back to his European cinematic heroes.) The last film in this stew of Segal is California Split<\/em> (1974), one of the all-time great films about gambling addiction, with fragmentation galore, courtesy of Robert Altman at his loosest. Segal kept on playing starring roles in charming movies for the rest of the Seventies and some of the Eighties, but the Altman film was the end of the top-notch, eminently rewatchable pictures that he made for about a decade. (And yes, I\u2019ve included at least one sequence where he sings out of the blue.)<\/p>\n

1443.) Part 3 of my ongoing tribute to the great French filmmaker Bertrand Blier focuses solely on his out-of-print-in-the-U.S. feature Beau-pere<\/em> (1981). As viewed from today\u2019s lens, the film would be perceived as \u201cproblematic,\u201d with its plot about a 30-year-old man who is left minding his teen stepdaughter when his wife dies \u2013 and winds up having a romantic and sexual relationship with her. Blier, however, was clearly veering away from Nabokov\u2019s path and trying to show how a bad decision gets made by a character \u2013 a lounge pianist, played by the late, great Patrick Dewaere \u2013 who habitually makes bad decisions. In the process, the film becomes one of Blier\u2019s more serious works, with a bit of his usual Theater of the Absurd influence, but mostly genuine emotion and an interestingly \u201cdistanced\u201d visual style (via zooms and images shot through windows and door frames). As the teen girl, Ariel Besse is the \u201cadult\u201d in the situation (who becomes the breadwinner in the relationship, thanks to her babysitting jobs); Dewaere, as always, makes his antihero lead a charming character in spite of his many fuck-ups.<\/p>\n

1444.) The second of my episodes devoted to the TV specials of Ann-Margret revolves around her second show, \u201cFrom Hollywood with Love,\u201d from 1969. After a discussion of where the special fits in her Sixties career (and the note that this aired the night that the Altamont Stones concert took place!), some key segments from the show, including a lengthy \u201cHollywood Game\u201d bit, in which A-M moves through her paces to become famous in H\u2019wood \u2013 in the process showing some great \u201969 L.A. locations and offering some great David Winters (choreographer turned TV director) glitz and weirdness. In addition to that lengthy, crazy segment (in which the \u201ckids of Hollywood\u201d are hippie mimes \u2013 naturellement\u2026), we venture into a rather chunky sketch in which A-M and Dean Martin are married and host Larry Storch (playing a gay gossip columnist \u2013 ??) gives us \u201cboth sides\u201d of their homelife (in which first Dean is an egomaniac, and then A-M is the egomaniac). The last-mentioned is scripted by Gail Parent and Kenny Solms (who wrote for everything in the Sixties\/Seventies, most prominently \u201cThe Carol Burnett Show\u201d and \u201cMary Hartman, Mary Hartman\u201d).<\/p>\n

1445.) The fourth episode of my ongoing tribute to the great French filmmaker Bertrand Blier focuses on his two early Eighties works-for-hire, which are still true to his personal style, even if they were conceived with certain stars in mind. The first is My Best Friend’s Girl<\/em> (1983), a sex farce intended to showcase the comic actor Coluche, which ends up being an inventory of romantic triangle situations played out in a ski lodge by two men and a woman. (The other stars are then-popular dreamboat Thierry Lhermitte and a glamorous young Isabelle Huppert.) The second film was constructed as a vehicle for Alain Delon, Notre Histoire (1984). Delon plays an alcoholic (still looking great) who has left his wife and develops an obsession for a unhappy-looking dream woman (Nathalie Baye), whom he follows from place to place \u2013 ultimately finding that she\u2019s slept with many other men who are just as obsessed about her as he is.<\/p>\n

1446.) For the 28th year in a row, the Funhouse salutes Jerry Lewis on Labor Day weekend. At this point, I\u2019ve covered Jerry from most conceivable angles, so what we have this time out might well be the last Jerry Lewis Funhouse outing \u2013 unless something comes to light or some film stirs a reappraisal. (Also, yrs truly has reached a saturation level.) So, what does the \u201clast\u201d Jerry salute contain? Firstly, an in-depth discussion of the eBay \u201cshower photos\u201d phenomenon \u2013 in which Jerry\u2019s limo driver Frank Branda collected \u201cnaughty\u201d pics of H\u2019wood stars (some\/most of which were given him by Jerry), which were put up for auction on eBay. The amounts these nude pics of Martin and Lewis at their peak sold for (it was definitely Dean\u2019s peak \u2013 Jerry was sheepish and hid his supposed endowment from view), the circumstances under which the pics were taken (and eventually reached the public eye), and yes, the contents of the pics themselves are discussed (and shown). Then it\u2019s time to read from a French study of Jerry\u2019s films \u2013 written in 1969, the book wildly praises Jerry, with the label \u201cpoet\u201d and the phrase \u201cmasterpiece\u201d (about… The Big Mouth<\/em>?), quotes from major French (and Greek) poets and intellects to reflect on his films, and a hyperbole-filled personal bio that was possibly supplied by Jerry\u2019s press office (or the man himself when he was cresting on Percodan high one evening). After that shower of praise \u2013 drenching some of Jer\u2019s best work and some of his unwatchable later films \u2013 we pull the cord and parachute to the safety of Vegas\/mutual praise\/hair grease (aka the MDA Telethon).<\/p>\n

1447.) In this installment of my ongoing series of tributes to the work of French satirist supreme Bertrand Blier, I discuss and show scenes from one of his wildest sex farces, Menage<\/em> (1986). The film, which has been out of circulation for a while in the U.S., follows the ways in which a larger-than-life seducer (Gerard Depardieu) takes over the existences of a tiny schnook (Michel Blanc) and his dissatisfied wife (Miou-Miou). He teaches them the ways of the master-thief and the hooker, transforming the husband in the meantime from a lovesick straight man into a proud woman. The film is Blier at his most extreme, and thus combines a dreamlike odyssey, bizarre situations, and charmingly amoral characters with a deft knack for poetically vulgar dialogue.<\/p>\n

1448.) The third of my episodes devoted to the TV specials of Ann-Margret shows off her early Seventies Las Vegas act, as recorded for the 1973 special \u201cAnn-Margret: When You\u2019re Smiling.\u201d By this point, her specials were getting more \u201cnormal,\u201d but her act in general still had the schizophrenic \u201cold show biz\/new show biz\u201d aspect that has made her career as a whole so fascinating. \u201cSmiling\u201d contains classic ballads and an all-out rockin\u2019 dance number (set to a major pop hit and\u2026 Mongo Santamaria?). Plus: an opening love\/murder song and an inexplicable specialty number about Lapland \u2013 not forgetting guests George Burns and Bob (stare right at the cue cards in all circumstances) Hope. \u201973 was during the \u201crecovering from the Sixties\u201d period and a lot of television still had old\/new juxtaposition, so why should A-M\u2019s act have been any different?<\/p>\n

1449.) My series of episodes saluting the work of Bertrand Blier reaches a turning point with his 1989 arthouse hit Too Beautiful For You<\/em>. In this film, Blier decisively moved away from his earlier \u201cmode\u201d (emphasizing moronic but oddly charming men and numb but oddly alluring women) into a new realm where true emotion was underneath the absurdist surface. The plot is so elemental it\u2019s amazing (yet a very good thing) that it was not remade into a mediocre American vehicle comedy \u2013 a man (Gerard Depardieu) married to an idyllic-looking beauty (Carole Bouquet) falls in love with a plain-looking temp in his office (Josiane Balasko). The film makes both women sympathetic and does convey some of the reasons our antihero can\u2019t deal with the \u201cperfection\u201d of his wife, while also mocking (in the classic Blier style) the rituals surrounding bourgeois adultery and the notion of beauty being the most desirable quality in a mate.<\/p>\n

1450.) The next episode in my series of shows devoted to Ann-Margret\u2019s amazing TV specials covers the 1975 amorphous creation \u201cAnn-Margret Olsson.\u201d By this point, A-M\u2019s self-admittedly schizo persona was wrought in stone \u2013 she was an all-American (by way of Sweden) wholesome girl who liked old-fashioned show-biz and simpler forms of entertainment, but was also was a product of the \u201crock era\u201d who could change on a dime into a a feverishly sexy, manic-dancing, song-belter. Both of those Ann-Margrets were on this show, as we see her: \u201csleeping\u201d with her male dancers (all shirtless, in a rather transparent enticement to her straight female and gay male followings); incarnating three classic pin-up singing gals of the 1940s; doing a full medley with the only woman her own age that she ever did such a thing with \u2013 Tina Turner (whom she had just appeared with in Tommy<\/em>; Tina was trying to free herself from her hubby, but was still billed on this special, although alone, as \u201cIke and Tina Turner\u201d); and doing a final sad number to salute Marilyn. That brief description of the show leaves out one major dance piece that is the 1970s in a nutshell, and the nuances of the different sides of Miss Olsson (including her ability to rock it out entirely with Tina).<\/p>\n

1451.) My series of tributes to the work of the great French satiric filmmaker Bertrand Blier continues with the film he called the start of his \u201csecond career,\u201d Merci La Vie<\/em> (1991). One of his two most out-there farces, Merci<\/em> puts the female characters in the forefront as a rambunctious drifter (Anouk Grinberg) meets up with a confused teen (Charlotte Gainsbourg) studying for her finals. The duo take a journey through a weird landscape that blends the filming of a period piece about occupied France during WWII with a small-town tale about a local physician (Gerard Depardieu) who has infected the men of the town with a sexually transmitted disease, via the drifter. Blier maintains his absurdist edge throughout, but the film is also a deeply sad comedy as two nightmares of the 20th century, the Holocaust and AIDS, are counterpointed, and the characters themselves often lose track of which narrative they currently inhabit. (Not to mention the inclusion of a character who represents Blier\u2019s father, the great French character actor Bernard Blier, who had died before the film was made.) Underseen in the U.S. and out of print for decades on any home-entertainment medium, Merci<\/em> is one of many great \u201cunfindable\u201d Blier films I\u2019m proud to give a U.S. TV debut to on the Funhouse.<\/p>\n

1452.) In this episode I discuss and show clips from the last of the classic Ann-Margret TV specials, \u201cAnn-Margret Smith\u201d from late 1975. Here, the principle of \u201chigh\u201d to \u201clow\u201d is truly acted out (with A-M\u2019s being both wholesome and tigress-ly sexy) as she does a series of musical numbers dedicated to various fine artists \u2013 singing a series of songs that have little to do with the artists in question (it has to be seen to be believed), although her versions of then-current Broadway hit songs are quite wonderful. The same \u201cschism\u201d exists in the show\u2019s guest roster, as A-M performs a lovely and lengthy medley with the late, great Michel Legrand (both in English and en Francais), preceded by her joining\u2026 the Bay City Rollers (!) for a version of their biggest hit stateside.<\/p>\n

1453.) In my continuing series of episodes paying tribute to the work of the underrated French filmmaker Bertrand Blier, we have reached the point where his absurdist comedies acquired a level of emotion that makes them seemingly more realistic \u2013 although the jumps in chronology, the shifts from one version of events to another, and direct address to the audience are still part of the program. In Un Deux Trois Soleil<\/em> (1993), Anouk Grinberg stars as a woman who jumps forwards and backwards from childhood to adolescence and adulthood; her mother is overbearing, her father (Marcello Mastroianni) is a friendly alcoholic, and her teenage boyfriend dies young and stays that way in her memory. The film is Blier mingling reality (a crowded apartment complex inhabited by immigrants) with fantasy (magical realism, in which her boyfriend and parents die and yet return in perfect shape, participating in her life as if nothing had happened). Although its plotline involves a character whose daily life is miles away from that of its creator, Blier cited this as one of his most personal films, as one of its themes (Mastroianni\u2019s character wanting to go back to his Mediterranean homeland) was a meditation on the death of Blier\u2019s father, the character actor Bernard Blier.<\/p>\n

1454.) Vintage: \u201cThe Cool Ghoul\u201d is in the spotlight this evening, as we re-enter the vault of Deceased Artistes to salute Mr. John Zacherle. Zach (aka \u201cZacherley\u201d) was a much-beloved horror-movie host who created his character in Philadelphia (under the name \u201cRoland\u201d) in the mid-Fifties, and then came to NYC to play his chortling, \u201cmonstrous\u201d alter-ego for several years in the Sixties. In this episode I show a brief sequence from one of the remaining kinescopes of his ABC show, then some ghoulish fun from the supplements on his \u201cZacherley Archive\u201d DVD. I close out with segments from the marvelous VHS creation \u201cHorrible Horror,\u201d which featured Zach doing his full act, replete with \u201cMy Dear\u201d (his wife, who was in a coffin onscreen) and \u201cGasport\u201d (his servant, who hung in a bag on-set \u2013 don\u2019t ask, one ever did). Zach was well-thought-of as a pioneering horror host, as a great free-form DJ and, most importantly, as an extremely nice guy.<\/p>\n

1455.) Moving forward in my series of episodes about the wildly underseen (and thoroughly wonderful) films of Bertrand Blier, this episode focuses on his 1996 study of romantic and sexual obsession, Mon Homme<\/em>. The film is the last of Blier\u2019s three collaborations with the actress Anouk Grinberg (Blier\u2019s partner in real life as well at the time), and one of the most linear of his film scripts. A hooker (Grinberg) who is looking for the \u201cone\u201d (both romantically and sexually) takes pity on a homeless man (Gerard Lanvin), whose sexual prowess is so impressive she falls in love with him and asks him to be her pimp \u2013 she had previously been a \u201cfree agent\u201d in the hooking biz. The newly minted pimp lets the hooker\u2019s devotion go to his head and tries to \u201cturn\u201d another woman into a sex worker \u2013 but she is content merely being his mistress. The plot then pivots with the imprisonment of the pimp, but I only have 28 minutes on the air, so that is a discussion for some other time. Mon Homme<\/em> continues Blier\u2019s \u201cdiscussion\u201d of obsession in relationships and his experimentation with standard forms of movie storytelling. It also boasts not one but two musical \u201cguardian angels\u201d on the score \u2013 the modern classical composer Gorecki and (since this is a film about sexual attraction) Barry White.<\/p>\n

1456.) The last (for now) of my episodes paying tribute to the TV specials of Ann-Margret. The 1980 90-minute spectacular \u201cHollywood Movie Girls\u201d was a last, characteristically schizophrenic outing for A-M that featured music, dance, comedy, dramatic vignettes, and much nostalgia for the Golden Age of Hollywood. George Burns is an ersatz host, taking us through different eras in Hollywood history, with A-M as the only woman in sight. We move from a silent movie sketch (with Bill \u201cYa doesn\u2019t has ta call me Johnson!\u201d Saluga) to a bit of drama in which Roger Moore and A-M act out a breakup, to A-M singing a Peter Allen \u201cecho of the old days\u201d tune, to A-M\u2019s then-current disco single. As a bonus, I return to her second special from 1969 (which aired on the night the Stones played Altamont!), spotlighting guests Dean Martin, Lucille Ball, and the Watts 103rd Street Rhythm Band. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

1405.) We\u2019ll be playing catch-up forever with the period of the late Sixties and early Seventies, when the film world exploded with unique, amorphous creations that mirrored the weird alternate directions society was going in during that time. And a lot of these films were aimed solely at [gasp!] adult viewers. Case in point: Belladonna […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":24,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"templates\/template-sidebar-none.php","meta":{"saved_in_kubio":false,"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-1776","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"kubio_ai_page_context":{"short_desc":"","purpose":"general"},"yoast_head":"\nTwenty-eighth year - Media Funhouse<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/mediafunhouse.com\/?page_id=1776\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Twenty-eighth year - Media Funhouse\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"1405.) We\u2019ll be playing catch-up forever with the period of the late Sixties and early Seventies, when the film world exploded with unique, amorphous creations that mirrored the weird alternate directions society was going in during that time. And a lot of these films were aimed solely at [gasp!] adult viewers. Case in point: Belladonna […]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/mediafunhouse.com\/?page_id=1776\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Media Funhouse\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/ed.grant.378\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2022-06-01T04:48:46+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@mediafunhouse\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"48 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/mediafunhouse.com\\\/?page_id=1776\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/mediafunhouse.com\\\/?page_id=1776\",\"name\":\"Twenty-eighth year - Media Funhouse\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/mediafunhouse.com\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2020-11-08T23:03:26+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2022-06-01T04:48:46+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/mediafunhouse.com\\\/?page_id=1776#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/mediafunhouse.com\\\/?page_id=1776\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/mediafunhouse.com\\\/?page_id=1776#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/mediafunhouse.com\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Previous Seasons\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/mediafunhouse.com\\\/?page_id=24\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Twenty-eighth year\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/mediafunhouse.com\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/mediafunhouse.com\\\/\",\"name\":\"Media Funhouse\",\"description\":\""From high art to low trash and back again!"\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/mediafunhouse.com\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/mediafunhouse.com\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/mediafunhouse.com\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Media Funhouse\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/mediafunhouse.com\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/mediafunhouse.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/mediafunhouse.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/09\\\/Funhouse-logo.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/mediafunhouse.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/09\\\/Funhouse-logo.jpg\",\"width\":453,\"height\":267,\"caption\":\"Media Funhouse\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/mediafunhouse.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/ed.grant.378\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/mediafunhouse\"]}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Twenty-eighth year - Media Funhouse","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/mediafunhouse.com\/?page_id=1776","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Twenty-eighth year - Media Funhouse","og_description":"1405.) We\u2019ll be playing catch-up forever with the period of the late Sixties and early Seventies, when the film world exploded with unique, amorphous creations that mirrored the weird alternate directions society was going in during that time. And a lot of these films were aimed solely at [gasp!] adult viewers. Case in point: Belladonna […]","og_url":"https:\/\/mediafunhouse.com\/?page_id=1776","og_site_name":"Media Funhouse","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/ed.grant.378","article_modified_time":"2022-06-01T04:48:46+00:00","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_site":"@mediafunhouse","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"48 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/mediafunhouse.com\/?page_id=1776","url":"https:\/\/mediafunhouse.com\/?page_id=1776","name":"Twenty-eighth year - Media Funhouse","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/mediafunhouse.com\/#website"},"datePublished":"2020-11-08T23:03:26+00:00","dateModified":"2022-06-01T04:48:46+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/mediafunhouse.com\/?page_id=1776#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/mediafunhouse.com\/?page_id=1776"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/mediafunhouse.com\/?page_id=1776#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/mediafunhouse.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Previous Seasons","item":"https:\/\/mediafunhouse.com\/?page_id=24"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Twenty-eighth year"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/mediafunhouse.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/mediafunhouse.com\/","name":"Media Funhouse","description":""From high art to low trash and back again!"","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/mediafunhouse.com\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/mediafunhouse.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/mediafunhouse.com\/#organization","name":"Media Funhouse","url":"https:\/\/mediafunhouse.com\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/mediafunhouse.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/mediafunhouse.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/Funhouse-logo.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/mediafunhouse.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/Funhouse-logo.jpg","width":453,"height":267,"caption":"Media Funhouse"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/mediafunhouse.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/ed.grant.378","https:\/\/x.com\/mediafunhouse"]}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/mediafunhouse.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/1776","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/mediafunhouse.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/mediafunhouse.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mediafunhouse.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mediafunhouse.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1776"}],"version-history":[{"count":51,"href":"https:\/\/mediafunhouse.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/1776\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2254,"href":"https:\/\/mediafunhouse.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/1776\/revisions\/2254"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mediafunhouse.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/24"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/mediafunhouse.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1776"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}